The reason why Korean manufacturers oppose legislation on mobile device distribution
- 가
- 가
윤상호 기자
- Transaction data of LG Electronics and LG U+ offers a glimpse at the reanson
By Yun Sang-ho crow@ddaily.co.kr
Digital Daily
Mobile phone manufacturers continue to oppose the government move to legislate a law for restructuring the distribution system of mobile devices and attempt to abort the legislation. The ‘bill on the improvement of the distribution system of mobile devices’ (the subsidy regulation act or the mobile phone distribution act, in short), is pending at the National Assembly. Manufacturers cite various reasons for their opposition but they have one goal. The transaction data of LG Electronics and LG U+ offer a glimpse at their intention. Since both LG Electronics and LG U+ are affiliated with LG Group, they are obliged to make public their transaction figures.
LG U+ purchased 1 trillion and 100 million won worth of goods and services from LG Electronics and sold 2.2 billion worth of goods to LG Electronics during the first three quarters of this year. A majority of goods that LG U+ bought from LG Electronics were smartphones. LG Electronics’ mobile phone sector achieved 9 trillion and 370.8 billion won sales around the world during the same period. This means that sales to LG U+ accounted for 10.7 percent of the total sales of LG Electronics during the period from January to September this year.
LG Electronics sold a total of 52.3 million mobile phones throughout the world during the same period. On the other hand, fewer than 20 million handsets are expected to be sold in Korea this year. LG U+’s share in the domestic market is a little more than 10 percent, which means that it sold 2.2 million mobile phones in Korea during the first three quarters, at most. From this, it is possible to estimate that domestic sales of mobile phones of LG Electronics accounted for only about 5 percent of its total sales volume.
LG U+ is No. 3 mobile communication service provider in Korea. By country, the United States and China are the world’s largest mobile phone markets. From a common-sense point of view, the list of major customers of LG Electronics should include several mobile carriers of these two countries. But LG Electronics’ mobile phone business is more dependent on LG U+ than any other carriers in the world. LG U+ is one of the top six customers of LG Electronics in terms of total revenue. The other five are such electronic goods stores as Sears, Best Buy, Goldiran, Home Depot and Hi-Mart. Korea’s No. 1 mobile service provider, SK Telecomm is not included in the top 5 list. From these facts, it is possible to infer that LG Electronics secures seed money by selling expensive mobile devices in Korea through the company in the same LG Group, LG U+, and expand business by selling low-end handsets in overseas markets.
The same could be said for Samsung Electronics and Pantech. However, their data are not available because unlike LG Electronics, they do not deal with a mobile service provider belonging to the same business group. Samsung Electronics recently had a hard time since the problem of higher domestic prices of its mobile devices than those for overseas markets was raised in a session of parliamentary inspection by the National Assembly’s Science, ICT, Future Planning, Broadcasting and Communications Committee. It was alleged that the factory price of ‘Galaxy Note 3’ in Korea is 290,000 won higher than the price in the U.S. market and that Samsung makes an average of 265,314 won in profit from selling a smartphone in Korea.
When the bill is passed by the National Assembly, it would be difficult for Samsung or LG to dominate the domestic market any more. The new law would allow more rooms for the foreign manufacturers that do not offer subsidy or have no distribution networks of their own in Korea. It would be impossible for Korean manufacturers to concentrate on the production and sales of high-end handsets. They would have to sell low-end phones, too. In some cases, they may have to lower the prices of high-end devices. The high-end phone market in Korea, where about 20 million sets are sold annually, would shrink and more importantly, would be shared by more manufacturers. Restructuring of the domestic market would be a disaster to the Korean handset manufacturers.
The current smart phone distribution system in Korea supports global business of its mobile device manufacturers at the expense of domestic consumers. Is the system rational? Would Korean families be able to be relieved from the burden of high communication costs when Korean manufacturers grow to a global level? Samsung Electronics is the world’s No. 1 mobile phone and smartphone manufacturer. According to Strategic Analytics (SA), a global market research company, Samsung has maintained its position as the world’s No. 1 mobile and smartphone manufacturer since the first quarter of 2012. But the prices of Samsung phones in Korea have not changed much.
By Yun Sang-ho crow@ddaily.co.kr
Digital Daily
Mobile phone manufacturers continue to oppose the government move to legislate a law for restructuring the distribution system of mobile devices and attempt to abort the legislation. The ‘bill on the improvement of the distribution system of mobile devices’ (the subsidy regulation act or the mobile phone distribution act, in short), is pending at the National Assembly. Manufacturers cite various reasons for their opposition but they have one goal. The transaction data of LG Electronics and LG U+ offer a glimpse at their intention. Since both LG Electronics and LG U+ are affiliated with LG Group, they are obliged to make public their transaction figures.
LG U+ purchased 1 trillion and 100 million won worth of goods and services from LG Electronics and sold 2.2 billion worth of goods to LG Electronics during the first three quarters of this year. A majority of goods that LG U+ bought from LG Electronics were smartphones. LG Electronics’ mobile phone sector achieved 9 trillion and 370.8 billion won sales around the world during the same period. This means that sales to LG U+ accounted for 10.7 percent of the total sales of LG Electronics during the period from January to September this year.
LG Electronics sold a total of 52.3 million mobile phones throughout the world during the same period. On the other hand, fewer than 20 million handsets are expected to be sold in Korea this year. LG U+’s share in the domestic market is a little more than 10 percent, which means that it sold 2.2 million mobile phones in Korea during the first three quarters, at most. From this, it is possible to estimate that domestic sales of mobile phones of LG Electronics accounted for only about 5 percent of its total sales volume.
LG U+ is No. 3 mobile communication service provider in Korea. By country, the United States and China are the world’s largest mobile phone markets. From a common-sense point of view, the list of major customers of LG Electronics should include several mobile carriers of these two countries. But LG Electronics’ mobile phone business is more dependent on LG U+ than any other carriers in the world. LG U+ is one of the top six customers of LG Electronics in terms of total revenue. The other five are such electronic goods stores as Sears, Best Buy, Goldiran, Home Depot and Hi-Mart. Korea’s No. 1 mobile service provider, SK Telecomm is not included in the top 5 list. From these facts, it is possible to infer that LG Electronics secures seed money by selling expensive mobile devices in Korea through the company in the same LG Group, LG U+, and expand business by selling low-end handsets in overseas markets.
The same could be said for Samsung Electronics and Pantech. However, their data are not available because unlike LG Electronics, they do not deal with a mobile service provider belonging to the same business group. Samsung Electronics recently had a hard time since the problem of higher domestic prices of its mobile devices than those for overseas markets was raised in a session of parliamentary inspection by the National Assembly’s Science, ICT, Future Planning, Broadcasting and Communications Committee. It was alleged that the factory price of ‘Galaxy Note 3’ in Korea is 290,000 won higher than the price in the U.S. market and that Samsung makes an average of 265,314 won in profit from selling a smartphone in Korea.
When the bill is passed by the National Assembly, it would be difficult for Samsung or LG to dominate the domestic market any more. The new law would allow more rooms for the foreign manufacturers that do not offer subsidy or have no distribution networks of their own in Korea. It would be impossible for Korean manufacturers to concentrate on the production and sales of high-end handsets. They would have to sell low-end phones, too. In some cases, they may have to lower the prices of high-end devices. The high-end phone market in Korea, where about 20 million sets are sold annually, would shrink and more importantly, would be shared by more manufacturers. Restructuring of the domestic market would be a disaster to the Korean handset manufacturers.
The current smart phone distribution system in Korea supports global business of its mobile device manufacturers at the expense of domestic consumers. Is the system rational? Would Korean families be able to be relieved from the burden of high communication costs when Korean manufacturers grow to a global level? Samsung Electronics is the world’s No. 1 mobile phone and smartphone manufacturer. According to Strategic Analytics (SA), a global market research company, Samsung has maintained its position as the world’s No. 1 mobile and smartphone manufacturer since the first quarter of 2012. But the prices of Samsung phones in Korea have not changed much.
Copyright ⓒ 디지털데일리. 무단전재 및 재배포 금지
당신이 좋아할 만한 뉴스
많이 본 기사
연재기사
실시간 추천 뉴스
-
금융당국 제동에 빗썸, KB국민은행과 신규 제휴 무산… NH농협은행과 6개월 더 연장
2024-09-20 15:28:10 -
공학한림원, 韓 제조업 가치 창출 위한 포럼 23일 개최
2024-09-20 15:17:19 -
광주은행, 신입행원 40여 명 공개 채용…"80% 지역 선발 예정"
2024-09-20 14:52:15 -
“現 미디어 산업 특성 반영한 새로운 방발기금 제도 논의 필요”
2024-09-20 14:15:21 -
이자내기도 힘든 '한계기업' 대출… 기업은행이 56조원으로 가장 많아, 우리은행은 대출비중 43% 차지
2024-09-20 14:12:36
회사명: ㈜디지털데일리｜제호: 디지털데일리｜등록번호 : 서울아00039｜등록발행연월일: 2005년 9월 6일｜사업자 등록번호: 101-86-13419
주소: (04057)서울특별시 마포구 신촌로14길 24(노고산동 54-46)｜대표전화: 02-334-7781｜Fax: 02-334-7782
대표자: 양경진｜편집국장: 채수웅｜개인정보·청소년보호책임자: 오주엽
Copyright © DIGITAL DAILY Co.,Ltd. All Rights Reserved.